Building on CO₂

Recycled granulate particles (Ø about 1.5 mm) after carbonation: The main products are CaCO₃ (light green) and C-S-H (pink), which reacts with newly formed cement phases during the production of recycled concrete. Image: Empa

Concrete is capable of re-binding the climate gas emitted during cement production, at least partially. "Carbonation" is the name of this process – a leisurely reaction that takes years and the pace of which depends on numerous factors. The DemoUpCARMA project, led by ETH Zurich, investigated how this process can be used and, above all, accelerated in a concrete plant – in a facility operated by Kästli Bau AG in Rubigen (BE) and using recycled material from concrete structures. The carbon dioxide from a sewage treatment plant was delivered liquefied and converted back into gas at the plant to continuously "flood" the recycled granulate using a process developed by the Bern-based company neustark AG.

Andreas Leemann and Frank Winnefeld from Empa's Concrete & Asphalt lab investigated how efficiently the granulate absorbs CO₂. Samples showed clear changes under the microscope: Smaller particles had patches of dark and light portions on the surface where the original cement had changed. Analyses showed that the light portions were calcium carbonate, while the dark phases consisted mainly of calcium silicate hydrate – C-S-H for short – the main product of cement hydration that gives concrete its strength. Carbonation removed some of the calcium from C-S-H: It thus became less calcareous and could in turn react with newly formed cement phases in recycled concrete – with the result that its compressive strength increased.

Tests with concrete types frequently used in Switzerland confirmed these findings. They showed that the process can make concrete more climate-friendly in two ways. Firstly, by absorbing CO₂ directly from the atmosphere: in the case of these novel building materials, this absorption can be up to 10 percent of the emissions initially released into the atmosphere during the production of the cement for the original concrete. Secondly, by reducing the cement content in recycled concrete by 5 to 7 percent – thanks to its higher strength. The bottom line, according to the Empa experts, is a CO₂ saving potential of a good 15 percent.

When, if and to what extent these results can be applied in practice is, of course, still open – partly because of the question of how well and at what technical and financial expense the process can be implemented in concrete plants.

Concrete without emissions: 20 percent by volume carbon pellets (black) result in net zero emissions. Image: Empa

Another team from Empa's Concrete & Asphalt lab is developing a process for integrating plant-based charcoal – biochar – into concrete. This material is produced by pyrolysis of biological material and consists to a very large extent of pure carbon, which the plants had taken up from the atmosphere in the form of CO₂ during their growth (in a process called photysynthesis).

While concrete products containing biochar are already on the market – the charcoal is often added to concrete in untreated form, which can lead to problems. "Plant-based carbon is very porous and therefore absorbs not only a lot of water, but also expensive admixtures used during concrete production," says Empa researcher Mateusz Wyrzykowski.

Therefore, the experts suggested processing it into pellets. To produce them, they used a rotary mixer filled with biochar, water and a binder, which yielded pellets with diameters between 4 and 32 millimeters. The researchers used the pellets to produce concrete of strength classes C20/25 to C30/37, which are widely used in building construction and civil engineering.

The resulting carbon footprint: With 20 percent by volume of carbon pellets in the concrete, the team achieved net zero emissions, according to Wyrzykowski – so the amount of carbon contained in the concrete offsets all emissions produced in the production of the pellets as well as the concrete. In the case of lightweight concrete with a density of around 1800 kg/m³, the balance becomes even better: A carbon content of 45 percent by volume leads to negative emissions of minus 290 kg CO₂/m³.

In the long term, Empa lab head Pietro Lura sees potential for negative emissions that go far beyond biochar. In a concept pursued by several Empa labs together, synthetic methane is produced in the Earth's sunbelt using just solar energy, water and atmospheric CO₂ followed by the subsequent pyrolysis of the gas. "This gives us hydrogen, which can be used in both industry and mobility, and solid carbon, which we can incorporate into concrete – just like biochar," says Lura.

Empa scientist Mateusz Wyrzykowski from the Concrete & Asphalt lab. Image: Empa

Biochar is also a topic in Empa's Building Energy Materials and Components lab. A team led by Jannis Wernery is developing a new type of insulating material from plant-based raw materials or waste that permanently binds the CO₂ it contains and thus acts as a permanent carbon sink. This is a promising idea, especially in view of the great importance of insulating materials in the task of making many buildings more energy-efficient and thus more climate-friendly in the future.

Most of the carbon plants had captured from the atmosphere in the form of CO₂ during their growth can be permanently fixed by pyrolysis. The resulting biochar can then be bound in the insulation of buildings throughout their lifetimes. What's more, after demolition of the buildings, the biochar could be brought out on fields, where it would increase the fertility of the soil, yet remain bound for centuries – unlike other plant-based building materials such as cellulose insulation, which release the stored CO₂ as it rots.

Of course, there are still many details to be clarified before the material is ready for use. For example, it must be ensured that all the ingredients of the insulation materials are suitable to be used as fertilizer. Moreover, a marketable product would have to be competitive in terms of thermal insulation and, at the same time, guarantee adequate fire protection. According to Empa researcher Wernery, preliminary studies showed that these goals are well within reach.

In the long term, biochar-based insulation materials could significantly improve Switzerland's carbon footprint. According to model calculations, a realistic partial replacement of conventional insulation materials with biochar could save around half a million tons of CO₂ equivalents each year – on the one hand through reduced emissions during their production, and on the other through the long-term storage of atmospheric CO₂. That would be equivalent to one percent of Switzerland's total greenhouse gas emissions. A project with a huge potential upside that also convinced funding institutions: The Minerva Foundation, the ETH Board and the Swiss Federal Office of Energy (SFOE) are supporting the project, as is the Stadtwerk Winterthur climate fund.